OAR@UM Collection:/library/oar/handle/123456789/316572026-06-13T21:05:19Z2026-06-13T21:05:19ZShared care guidelines for patient medicines management in breast and colon cancer/library/oar/handle/123456789/557292021-02-18T12:45:03Z2017-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Shared care guidelines for patient medicines management in breast and colon cancer
Abstract: The introduction of oral chemotherapy has lead to cancer patients receiving these
medications through community pharmacies rather than having to visit a hospital to have
their oncology medication administered. This change represents a shift from therapy
being given in hospital, to therapy being given in the patient’s own home. In this context,
community pharmacists can provide a significant intervention by supporting patients to
manage and prevent oral chemotherapy side effects, thus avoiding unwarranted trips to
hospital, which saves money and time, resulting in an improvement in the patient’s
quality of life. The aim of this research was to compile shared care guidelines for oral
chemotherapy used in the management of breast, colon and prostate cancer.
Five shared care guidelines were created for: capecitabine, everolimus, abiraterone,
enzalutamide and ruxolitinib. The developed documents were validated by a panel of
experts consisting of four oncologists, a principal and a senior pharmacist within the
compounding section at Mater Dei Hospital, and a senior pharmacist at Sir Anthony
Mamo Oncology Hospital. A patient focus group was developed during which five
patients receiving oral chemotherapy from a community pharmacy were invited to
participate in the focus group and given a questionnaire to capture the patient’s experience
about the service received from the community pharmacist. The developed shared care
guidelines were presented to community pharmacists during an educational program
about managing chemotherapy side effects. Scored questionnaires were handed out to the
pharmacists before and after the program to determine if there was an improvement in
responses.
The validation panel reported on the content and validity of the shared care guidelines
developed. The educational program was carried out for 11 community pharmacists who
are currently practicing in community pharmacies where dispensing of oncology oral
therapy is undertaken. The mean response rate before the educational program was
5.45% whilst the mean response rate after the program was 80%. From the patient focus
group issues related to information presented to the patient about what side effects to be
expected, how these side effects should be handled and how these medications should be
stored were identified. These points were used to develop the framework for the shared
care guidelines and each guideline now consists of indications, administration, side effects
and storage information.
The shared care guidelines were developed within a collaborative framework and are
intended to further substantiate effective communication between healthcare professionals
at different settings, namely: the hospital multidisciplinary team and the community
pharmacist dispensing the oral chemotherapy drugs.
Description: PharmD2017-01-01T00:00:00ZDetecting signals of electrocardiogram QT prolongation and QT shortening : regulatory implications/library/oar/handle/123456789/557282021-02-18T10:37:30Z2017-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Detecting signals of electrocardiogram QT prolongation and QT shortening : regulatory implications
Abstract: Drug-induced changes to the conductivity of the human ether-a-go-go related gene
(hERG) potassium channels, affect cardiac repolarisation and put patients at risk of fatal
cardiac arrhythmias such as Torsade de Pointes. Healthcare professionals and patients
benefit from knowing which medicinal products cause this adverse event, in order to
minimise co-prescribing of such drugs or to carry out appropriate monitoring.
The aim of this study was to detect and characterize the QT change liability of authorised
medicinal products. The methodology was in two parts. Study 1 involved extracting
signals from the Eudravigilance database, and in study 2 an in-depth assessment of
unexpected signals through review of literature, preclinical, adverse drug reaction and
clinical trial data was performed. Proportional reporting ratios were used to identify
statistical associations between drugs and QT change and expectedness was checked
through the product information (PI). A list for the frequency of expectedness was
created. Drugs not expected to cause QT changes were evaluated within the Bradford
Hill criteria for association.
Four hundred and seventeen candidates with a potential signal of QT modulation were
identified. Of these, 12 products did not have QT change as an expected adverse event
and so were assessed. Results from the assessment showed that changes to the PI of
mirabegron, asenapine and pantoprazole could be warranted and signals on QT
prolongation for mirabegron and asenapine were reported to the European Medicines
Agency’s Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC). In March 2017, the
PRAC rapporteurs for these active substances (Spain and United Kingdom) agreed to
take regulatory action and update the SPCs within the next periodic safety review
procedures, starting in quarter four 2017. For pantoprazole, an emergent signal of
hypokalaemia may warrant further separate investigation. For QT shortening, fingolimod
and olanzapine were assessed, and the data for these two drugs did not lead to a
recommendation for change to the PI due to lack of robust evidence.
In conclusion, this study presents a number of outputs; (1) inferences on (a) mirabegron,
(b) asenapine and (c) pantoprazole, (2) assessment recommendations for preclinical
assessors and marketing authorisation holders looking at hERG studies, (3) reflections on
the pharmacological basis of short QT, and (4) an innovative proposal for a QT drugs list
with risk categorisation.
Description: PharmD2017-01-01T00:00:00ZPatient-centred monitoring in chronic disease management in the community pharmacy/library/oar/handle/123456789/557272024-05-27T11:39:34Z2017-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Patient-centred monitoring in chronic disease management in the community pharmacy
Abstract: Chronic diseases present a number of challenges for healthcare systems worldwide.
Community pharmacists are in a unique position to participate in the chronic care of
their patients through patient monitoring and medication management. The aim of this
research was to evaluate the impact of a pharmacist-led chronic disease management
service by identifying drug-related problems (DRPs) and assessing the pharmacist
intervention on patient health outcomes. A chronic disease management service was
implemented in a community pharmacy. Fifty patients taking at least one chronic
medication were recruited. Two medication review sessions were held; an initial session
and a follow-up session after 4 months. During the sessions, point-of-care testing for
blood pressure, blood glucose and HbA1c monitoring as well as lifestyle advice were
provided. A pharmaceutical care plan with recommendations to solve DRPs was
developed for each patient. Forty-eight patients completed the study, with a mean age
of 69 years and taking an average of 5 medications daily. A total of 207 DRPs were
identified with a mean of 4.25 DRPs per patient, which mainly involved undertreatment
(18.8%), monitoring (18.4%) and compliance (17.9%) issues. Most DRPs were solved
(78.6%) or partially solved (16.5%). Following the pharmacist intervention, there was a
decrease in systolic blood pressure by 10mmHg (p<0.001), diastolic blood pressure by
4mmHg (p=0.001), fasting blood glucose by 1.7mmol/L (p<0.001) and HbA1c level by
0.5% (p<0.001). Medication compliance improved from a mean score of 17.7 to 21.7
out of a total score of 25 (p<0.001) and patient satisfaction increased from a mean score
of 2.61 to 4.11 after intervention out of a total score of 5 (p<0.001). The patient-centred
monitoring service had a significant positive impact, suggesting that expanding the role
of community pharmacists in chronic disease management can improve patient health
outcomes.
Description: PharmD2017-01-01T00:00:00ZSafer anticoagulation management in the community : a pharmacist-led approach/library/oar/handle/123456789/557262021-02-18T12:44:06Z2017-01-01T00:00:00ZTitle: Safer anticoagulation management in the community : a pharmacist-led approach
Abstract: Therapeutic monitoring in patients on warfarin is essential to enhance treatment efficacy
with less complications. Medicine use review (MUR) enables individualised patient
assessment to check and balance drug-related problems (DRPs). The aim of this
research was to develop and implement a pharmacist-led MUR for patients on warfarin,
assess patient knowledge and adherence, and address identified risks with prescribed
treatment. Patients on warfarin attended a structured MUR session, during which
baseline information to assess patient knowledge and adherence to warfarin treatment was collected. Point-of-care INR testing was performed with the CoaguChek®XS
device. Medication reconciliation was performed to identify DRPs and to recommend
clinical interventions. Patients were followed-up after two months to evaluate the
impact of pharmacist intervention and degree of implementation of the pharmacist
researcher‟s recommendations by the physician, pharmacist or patient. A total of 100
patients (56 male, 44 female; mean age 70.5 ±10.30, range 33-89 years) were assessed.
Forty patients had an INR value outside the target range. The mean score in the warfarin
knowledge test improved significantly from 7 to 10 points out of 12 post-intervention
(p<0.05). The number of patients who were non-adherent to warfarin decreased from 25
to 11 post-intervention (p<0.05). Post-intervention a significant improvement in INR
control was observed where time spent within therapeutic range increased from 69% to
80% (p<0.05). A total of 632 medications were reconciled (mean 6 ±2.76, range 1-16
medications/patient). A total of 481 DRPs (mean 5 ±1.83, range 0-9 DRPs/patient) were
identified, out of which 40% were related to warfarin. Need for monitoring (30%), lack
of compliance (20%) and need for patient education (19%) were the top three DRPs
identified. Eighty-four percent of the pharmacist researcher‟s recommendations were
accepted, 20% of which resulted in changes to drug treatment. Ninety patients would be
willing to use the proposed MUR service, if implemented. Improvement in patient
knowledge, adherence, INR control and the high proportion of implemented
recommendations suggest that pharmacist-led MUR improves therapeutic outcomes and
patient safety.
Description: PharmD2017-01-01T00:00:00Z