OAR@UM Community: Previously known as Department of Gender Studies
/library/oar/handle/123456789/20530
Previously known as Department of Gender Studies2026-06-14T06:45:49Z"Dejjem ninkwieta fuq il-flus..." the gendered dimensions of emotional inequalities in managing household money in Malta
/library/oar/handle/123456789/147354
Title: "Dejjem ninkwieta fuq il-flus..." the gendered dimensions of emotional inequalities in managing household money in Malta
Abstract: Drawing on a critical feminist qualitative study of eight married heterosexual couples in Malta,
interviewed both jointly and individually, this paper examines the emotional experience and
emotional inequalities embedded in household money management. It explores how partners
interpret responsibility, worry, and confidence in everyday financial decision-making and how these
affective dimensions shape the gendered organisation of domestic economic life.; Analysis of 24 in-depth, semi-structured interviews reveals a persistent emotional asymmetry: wives
consistently shoulder a disproportionate share of financial anxiety, anticipatory planning, and self-doubt
regarding budgeting, spending, and saving. This remains evident even in couples who describe
their financial arrangements as "shared." In contrast, husbands more frequently articulate — or are
portrayed by their spouses as embodying — feelings of confidence, expertise, or delegated
responsibility. Many men frame financial management as a technical or even an enjoyable task, rather
than an ongoing emotional burden. Notably, this sense of ease is not mirrored when wives take
primary responsibility for the household finances.; These dynamics reflect entrenched cultural norms that position women as the emotional guardians of
household wellbeing and men as competent financial actors within marriage. The study demonstrates
that emotional inequalities, particularly around anxiety, responsibility, and confidence, constitute an
under-recognised dimension of the gendered division of labour.2026-05-01T00:00:00ZDeconstructing gender and power : a feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis of "Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin" (misbehaved club)
/library/oar/handle/123456789/147279
Title: Deconstructing gender and power : a feminist post-structuralist discourse analysis of "Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin" (misbehaved club)
Abstract: This paper explores how Il-Każin tal-Imqarbin, a contemporary theatrical work set in 1980s Malta,
constructs and challenges gendered and heteronormative discourses through the lens of Feminist
Post-Structuralist Discourse Analysis (FPDA). By critically engaging with the play's language, character
dynamics, and narrative structure, the research investigates how power, gender performativity, and
marginalisation are communicated, contested, and reimagined within a historically queer-invisible
Maltese context.; The study highlights the importance of examining cultural productions as sites where silenced
LGBTQ+ narratives can be reclaimed and made visible, particularly in periods marked by
institutionalised heteronormativity and social conservatism. The analysis focuses not only on the
play's historical backdrop but also on its continuing relevance, demonstrating how Il-Każin tal-
Imqarbin destabilises rigid binary gender roles. By adopting a feminist post-structuralist perspective,
the paper examines how discourses surrounding gender and sexuality are both reflected and
subverted within the script, offering alternative ways of understanding subjectivity and agency.2026-05-01T00:00:00ZInstitutional contradictions and gendered realities : a feminist reworking of new institutional theory in higher education
/library/oar/handle/123456789/147278
Title: Institutional contradictions and gendered realities : a feminist reworking of new institutional theory in higher education
Abstract: This article investigates how formal institutional frameworks and family-friendly policies at the
University of Malta intersect with gendered cultural norms to shape uneven outcomes for working
mothers. Using an integrated analytical approach that draws on New Institutional Theory (NIT),
Feminist Institutionalism, and Institutional Ethnography (IE), the study reveals how organisational
structures that appear inclusive on the surface are often undermined by discretionary practices and
informal expectations that reproduce gendered hierarchies.; The research combines textual analysis of institutional documents, survey data, and qualitative
interviews with academic and support-staff mothers. The findings demonstrate a consistent
implementation gap between policy and practice, highlighting the influence of managerial discretion,
entrenched power asymmetries, and the persistence of invisible labour. By bringing feminist
institutional insights into conversation with NIT and IE, the study offers a more nuanced framework
for understanding the motherhood penalty in academia and underscores the need for stronger
accountability and gender-sensitive institutional practices.; The argument builds on and extends existing feminist scholarship on institutional processes and
inequalities (Cacace, Mellino, & Recio, 2023; Chappell & Waylen, 2020; Monro, 2021; O'Connor, 2022;
Smith & Griffith, 2022).2026-05-01T00:00:00ZBeyond the anthropological machine : a biopolitical reading of the intersection between woman and animal
/library/oar/handle/123456789/147259
Title: Beyond the anthropological machine : a biopolitical reading of the intersection between woman and animal
Abstract: Historically, the construction of the normative subject has perpetuated Cartesian dualism,
establishing a framework where the "Other" is subjected to structural oppression under
anthropocentric, patriarchal, speciesist, and capitalist hegemony. Stripped of subjectivity and reduced
to objecthood, marginalized bodies are rendered violable, exploitable, and "killable," revealing
violence as a systematic form of governance. Women and animals serve as the primary sites of this
biopolitical administration.; Sovereign power employs a discursive violence — specifically, a two-way metaphorical transitivity —
to legitimize this control: the animalization of women and the feminization of animals. Through this
transitivity, both groups are abstracted from "rights-bearing subject" and drawn into the "bare life"
field of biopolitical power. The body is thus reduced to an object, valued strictly for its productive
capacity. The convergence of medical and industrial practices forms a biopolitical nexus between
fertility and productivity. Andro-anthropocentrism codes these bodies as 'reproductive machines,'
defining femininity exclusively through motherhood. This discourse frames "infertile" or trans women
as ontologically "deficient."; A similar situation occurs in the dairy and meat industry through the female animal body. Within this
capitalist system, where animals' right to life is contingent upon productivity, cows that lose their
fertility or milk yield ("infertile") and "breeding" bulls deemed "dysfunctional" because they cannot
perform "masculinity" are reclassified as disposable and are discarded. The intersectional oppression
of women's and animals' bodies represents the most naked manifestation of power's authority to
make live and kill over bodies. While women's bodies are rendered socially invisible, animals' bodies
are physically destroyed. To this end, employing an ecofeminist animal studies perspective and critical
discourse analysis, this study examines the categorization practices of sovereign power, presenting a
conceptual framework that deconstructs the anthropocentric hierarchy.2026-05-01T00:00:00Z