OAR@UM Collection:
/library/oar/handle/123456789/46550
2026-06-13T09:29:32ZIran nuclear deal and European Union : the end of a myth?
/library/oar/handle/123456789/46629
Title: Iran nuclear deal and European Union : the end of a myth?
Abstract: On the 2nd of April 2015, the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
between the Islamic Republic of Iran and the P5+1 (the permanent
members of the United Nations Security Council—the United States, the
United Kingdom, Russia, France, and China—plus Germany) and the
European Union, (known as JCPOA), was signed in Vienna, and was
considered by the European Union as a personal victory. For the
EU, JCPOA represented the living demonstration that its soft power
was a reality and that this organization, without military means,
was able to have a political and diplomatic weight upon the world.
However, this agreement, reached despite so many difficulties,
is now in turmoil under the Trump presidency. Is this model
condemned?
Description: This document contains Notes on Authors, the Seminar Agenda, and a photo inset.2018-04-01T00:00:00ZThe vulnerable Iran nuclear deal : a failure in the two-level game
/library/oar/handle/123456789/46628
Title: The vulnerable Iran nuclear deal : a failure in the two-level game
Abstract: Recent statements and decisions by the Trump Administration
have signaled the Administration’s willingness to destabilize
the Iran nuclear deal. These events have been viewed through a
variety of lenses in an attempt to both understand why current
decisions were made, but also in an attempt to predict future
action. The Administration’s positions have been seen alternately
as isolationist or heavy handed, as ignoring the international
community and international commitments or putting America
first. But the Trump administration’s ability to back away from an
international obligation is founded in what I believe is a political not
a policy failure. It reflects the inability of the Obama Administration
to sell the Iran Nuclear deal to the American public and their
elected representatives, in terms that made the vastly complicated
technical deal comprehensible to a public whose attention span
is limited. More importantly, the Obama Administration did not
fulfill the requirements of two level negotiation needed to bring the
internal political constituency onboard and to get them committed
to the deal as the best alternative.2018-04-01T00:00:00ZThe Iran nuclear deal two years on : future unclear and getting worse
/library/oar/handle/123456789/46627
Title: The Iran nuclear deal two years on : future unclear and getting worse
Abstract: The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) was formally
agreed on 14 July 2015 between Iran and the so-called E3/EU+3:
United Kingdom, France, Germany, United States, Russia, China,
and the European Union. It was a culmination of nearly two years of
difficult negotiations, and is an extraordinarily complex document,
spanning, with all its annexes, over a hundred pages. It ensures that
Iran does not acquire nuclear weapons for 10-15 years in exchange
for the easing of sanctions. The implementation is guaranteed by
a comprehensive institutional framework and the most intrusive
verification regime in the history of the International Atomic
Energy Agency (IAEA).2018-04-01T00:00:00ZWhat future for the Iran nuclear deal?
/library/oar/handle/123456789/46572
Title: What future for the Iran nuclear deal?
Abstract: Since the 2015 nuclear accord with Iran (Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action or JCPOA) was concluded, the International
Atomic Energy Agency which is tasked with verification of its
implementation has been regularly reporting that Iran has been
adhering to the deal since it took effect1. Corresponding abolition
of some sanctions and increased European economic ties to Iran
followed, and the EU and the E3 - the EU countries involved in
negotiating the deal - lauded the agreement as stabilizing the region,
strengthening the transatlantic relations, and shoring up the global
non-proliferation regime.
Still, the future of the agreement between Iran and the five
permanent members of the UN Security Council plus Germany is
unclear and precarious. US President Trump in January 2018 set a
120-day deadline (12th May 2018) for US lawmakers and European
allies to “fix” the deal, one of President Obama’s main foreign policy
achievements, otherwise the US would exit the agreement.2018-04-01T00:00:00Z