OAR@UM Collection:
/library/oar/handle/123456789/74126
2026-05-26T15:47:42ZDeveloping an enhanced video communication system between multidiscipline dispersed teams
/library/oar/handle/123456789/74749
Title: Developing an enhanced video communication system between multidiscipline dispersed teams
Abstract: Today’s globalisation encourages several companies that are globally distributed to
virtually collaborate on a common task to maximise time and money. This project
includes a process improvement methodology which is the DMAIC (Define, Measure,
Analyse, Improve, Control) process on a system that already exists at Methode
Electronics Malta Ltd. This system, also known as the Hawk-Eye system, is used to
video conference between Malta and Egypt to avoid experts in Malta having to travel to
Egypt to solve issues with relation to maintenance and repair.
The improvements are essential since presently this system does not encourage the user
to make use of it, as most of the times there is misunderstanding and bad quality in
communication techniques. Hence, the experts in Malta need to travel onsite. This
results in a long downtime to solve issues and thus incurring travel expenses. The newly
developed system was a gradual improvement of the current system by utilizing the five
phases of the DMAIC methodology.
The newly developed system was improved by considering both literature review and
the DMAIC methodology. Different communication techniques and mediums where
analysed in detail to identify and choose the correct elements for this particular system.
It is important that the company’s and users’ needs are clear so that the system will meet
their expectations and goals.
By means of DMAIC process, the problem was first defined and was then followed by
the Measure phase to identify the greatest limitations that the users are facing with the
current system. In the Analyse phase, the data collected in the Measure phase and root
causes of the limitations were analysed. Then the Improvement phase included the
different elements to enhance the system with the help of the data collected and the
literature review. Finally, the Control phase includes which techniques should be
utilized so that the system remains in control and will be further improved. A number of
different quality tools are used throughout the different phases of both the DMAIC such
as the Cause and Effect diagram, Pareto Chart and Affinity Diagram.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)2020-01-01T00:00:00ZTwo-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer and rigid thermoplastic
/library/oar/handle/123456789/74741
Title: Two-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer and rigid thermoplastic
Abstract: This project is a collaboration between the University of Malta and Trelleborg Sealing
Solutions Malta. The main aim of this project is to investigate the process parameters
which should be optimised to produce rubber to plastic products (a subset of two
component technology) with the best possible bond strength between the rigid
thermoplastic component and the thermoset elastomer component of the final product.
Two-component injection moulding of thermoset elastomer (rubber) and thermoplastic
is a new technology that enables the production of components made from those two
material types without the use of conventional moulding processes such as over
moulding) or post-processes (assembly). However, the moulding material combinations
proposed by TSS involve balancing competing temperature processes with the high-performance
thermoplastic component being injected from a hot barrel to a cold mould
and the reverse for the high-performance engineering thermoset elastomer component.
These two competing requirements in the same mould will affect the process itself,
making it a rather delicate and unpredictable process without adequate analysis.
The project commenced with the proper research and selection of software- based tools
that would be used to conduct an in-depth analysis to support the optimisation of the
production process. Once the tools were selected, specific equipment and material
knowledge was expanded upon within TSS facilities and production, validation testing,
materials testing, characterization analyses and finally the optimized process parameters
were obtained and shared with TSS in the form of this report.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)2020-01-01T00:00:00ZSustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages
/library/oar/handle/123456789/74733
Title: Sustainability assessment of recyclable and reusable plastic cosmetic packages
Abstract: The importance of sustainability has become increasingly relevant in past years, with
the government, businesses, and the general public alike striving to improve their
environmental footprint in various aspects of their life. This sense of sustainable urgency
also applies to the cosmetic industry, which contributes significantly to the global plastic
manufactured and used worldwide.
The main tool used to assess the proposed methodology was the life cycle analysis
(LCA). The primary goal of this study was to analyse the total life cycle environmental
impact of a reusable cosmetic product and a recyclable cosmetic product. This was done
by creating several different versions of the existing cosmetic product being analysed,
with each version housing a specific attribute change. Some examples of the attribute
alterations include applying different rates of dematerialisation, adding recycling
potential, and altering the product’s design to study the effect that this has on
sustainability. In total seven versions were proposed, including the original existing
version which was treated as the benchmark. Results showed that the most
environmentally friendly version proved to be the design which eliminated the use of
the pan altogether, thus allowing the cosmetic powder to be inserted directly into the
case itself. However, this was deemed as not being entirely realistic, since the pan
component design cannot be altered easily. Thus, the most environmental version
resulted in being the version which is both reusable and recyclable.
In addition to this, the variation of the environmental footprint with regards to all phases
of the plastic cosmetic product’s life cycle, i.e. raw material extraction, manufacturing,
transportation, use, and end of life, were also analysed. It was found that throughout all
the seven versions, the biggest contributor by far was contributed to the raw material
extraction and manufacturing stages. Furthermore, the effect of how altering different
parameters such as the manufacturing location, and end of life location were studied.
Results showed that manufacturing in Malta proved to be 13% more environmentally
friendly than manufacturing in China, and that using and disposing of this product in
Europe proved to be on average 44% more environmentally friendly then the proposed
alternative in the United States of America. Finally, the cost aspect of sustainability was
also discussed by using the life cycle costing tool. In summary, this exercise found that
the highest part contributor to the case assembly was the mirror, and that manufacturing
in China proved to be cheaper overall than manufacturing in Malta.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)2020-01-01T00:00:00ZDesign of a 3D printed industrial robotic manipulator
/library/oar/handle/123456789/74533
Title: Design of a 3D printed industrial robotic manipulator
Abstract: Industrial robotic manipulators are a whole family of industrial machinery whose
purpose is to, accurately and precisely, position and orient tools called end-effectors
from one location to another. These so-called end-effectors come in the form of grippers,
welding torches, power tools and countless other devices that are designed to
accomplish specific industrial operations. This project explores the possibility of
designing an original industrial robotic manipulator and subsequently transforming the
design into an operational prototype through the application of 3D printing technologies.
The finished product was to replicate the performance observed in a real-life
manipulator as accurately as possible, with all limitations considered.
The methodology adopted was based on ‘The Basic Design Cycle’ of engineering design
theory. During the problem analysis stage, the quantifiable, physical, safety and
technological requirements were drawn up in a Product Design Specifications (PDS)
chart. Once these requirements were formulated, the design process was branched into
two sections, so that the solution could be developed in stages. In preparation of the
design processes, the torques required at each joint were estimated through a static
model analysis, which was based on the quantifiable requirements set in the PDS. The
results obtained could then be used as a general guideline throughout the following
design process sections.
The first section involved the design, prototyping and optimization of the first joint
prototype, which determined the fundamental elements of the entire robotic
manipulator. The second section featured the incorporation of the optimized robotic
joint design into the whole scheme of the project. Having defined the main elements in
the first section, the second stage focussed more on the selection of concepts,
configurations, and actuators. The assembly as well as the control system of the whole
industrial robotic manipulator were designed based on the decisions made.
Finally, once the complete prototype was produced and assembled, evaluation and
testing were carried out as to define its performance. Strengths, limitations and possible
improvements of both design and physical prototype were also specified.
Description: B.ENG (HONS)2020-01-01T00:00:00Z