/library/oar/handle/123456789/60875 Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:01:26 GMT 2025-10-31T22:01:26Z /library/oar/handle/123456789/128829 Title: Does access to abortion clash with equality of rights? Authors: Demicoli, Leighton John Abstract: Every life is inherently precious and has to be protected in every possible way. Hence, the principle defining equality, or aequalitas, in the eyes of the law is that all people must be equally protected by the same law. This concept has long been the subject of philosophical and moral controversy, but at its core, it is the notion that everyone should be treated fairly and have access to the same opportunities for development.[1] Yet, one of the most divisive topics in medical ethics and law is the legal standing of the foetus, causing a tug-of-war between maternal rights and foetal claims. Sun, 01 Jan 2023 00:00:00 GMT /library/oar/handle/123456789/128829 2023-01-01T00:00:00Z /library/oar/handle/123456789/73915 Title: The Law Journal : Volume 3 : Issue 3 Abstract: The Law Journal was, at the time, the first and only local legal publication on our island. Its existence was indicative of a lacuna, one which academics would not fill. It took a group of law students, balancing their studies and other commitments, to organise such a publication. Sat, 01 Jan 1955 00:00:00 GMT /library/oar/handle/123456789/73915 1955-01-01T00:00:00Z /library/oar/handle/123456789/73914 Title: Editorial [The Law Journal : Volume 3 : Issue 3] Abstract: We welcome the new students who have this year joined the intermediate Course of Arts and who intend to join the Course of Laws. We should like to remind these new students that the Law Society is their own society more than any other University Society and we invite them as from now to take an active interest in the society and in its activities, for it is they who in the near future will be called upon to guide the fortunes of the Law Society. Sat, 01 Jan 1955 00:00:00 GMT /library/oar/handle/123456789/73914 1955-01-01T00:00:00Z /library/oar/handle/123456789/73913 Title: Notes on cases I - Fenech vs Bianchi noe Abstract: This case was decided by the First Hall of the Civil Court on the 26th May, 1952. The present note concerns a point which wasdiscussed before the Court but which was left undecided, as the Court based its judgement on a preliminary issue of fact, notwithstanding that the parties had refrained by agreement from producing evidence on the point of fact adjudicated upon. The legal question involved was not mentioned in any way in the judgement, so that the present note refers not to the actual contents of the judgement but to an interesting point which, as far as is known, has never been authoritatively settled by any local Court. Sat, 01 Jan 1955 00:00:00 GMT /library/oar/handle/123456789/73913 1955-01-01T00:00:00Z