Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: /library/oar/handle/123456789/140347
Title: Indefinite anticoagulation with reduced-intensity direct oral anticoagulants in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis. An international practice survey
Authors: ¶Ù±ð±ô±ô³Ü³¦,&#³æ20;´¡³Ü°ùé±ô¾±±ð²Ô
Carrier, Marc
Lauw, Mandy
Cuker, Adam
Bertoletti, Laurent
Beyer-Westendorf, Jan
Di Nisio, Marcello
Simard, Camille
Roberge, Guillaume
Harrigan, Amye
Shivakumar, Sudeep
Skeith, Leslie
Ageno, Walter
Riva, Nicoletta
Keywords: Blood -- Coagulation
Hematologic agents
Anticoagulants (Medicine)
Thrombosis
Thrombolytic therapy
Issue Date: 2025
Publisher: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Citation: Delluc, A., Carrier, M., Lauw, M., Cuker, A., Bertoletti, L., Beyer-Westendorf, J.,...Riva, N. (2025). Indefinite anticoagulation with reduced-intensity direct oral anticoagulants in patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis. An international practice survey. Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, 10.1097/MBC.0000000000001388.
Abstract: Introduction: Low-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) could be beneficial for secondary prevention of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT) in subgroups of patients at high risk for recurrence. In the absence of direct evidence, we aimed to identify the practice preferences of physicians managing patients with SVT in an international web-based survey. Methods and results: An anonymous questionnaire was sent via E-Mail between April and July 2023 to members of 14 national and international scientific societies. We received 236 responses of which 175 were complete responses. After an initial 3-6 months of SVT treatment, more than 80% of respondents would continue anticoagulation in the presence of cancer, myeloproliferative neoplasms, or in case of unprovoked SVT. If anticoagulation is continued, 45.8-68.6% would use reduced-intensity dosing of DOACs. In case of compensated cirrhosis or controlled inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), 54.3% and 44.4% of respondents would continue anticoagulation and 68.8% and 73.3% would opt for reduced-intensity DOAC dosing, respectively. Gastroenterologists were more likely to discontinue anticoagulation in SVT associated with cancer, controlled IBD, or unprovoked event, and more likely to continue anticoagulation in compensated cirrhosis compared to other specialists. Overall, 96% of respondents supported prospective evaluation of low-dose DOACs for the secondary prevention of SVT. Conclusion: This survey showed that physicians adapt duration and intensity of anticoagulation therapy depending on the patient's specific condition and risk factors even in the absence of high-quality evidence. Prospective evaluation is awaited.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/140347
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacM&SPat

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
indefinite_anticoagulation_with_reduced_intensity.222.pdf
  Restricted Access
792.44 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.