Comparative analysis of temporary protection for Ukrainian nationals fleeing war and standard asylum procedures : addressing double standards

Abstract

This dissertation examines the comparative treatment of Ukrainian nationals fleeing the 2022 war and other asylum seekers, with a focus on temporary protection versus standard asylum procedures. The study analyzes the differential responses of host countries, particularly in Europe, to refugees from Ukraine compared to those from other conflict zones such as the Middle East and Africa. Drawing on international refugee law, political dynamics, and public perceptions, the research explores how temporary protection mechanisms for Ukrainian refugees have been implemented and contrasts these practices with the standard asylum processes. A central theme is the identification of double standards in refugee protection, highlighting disparities in access to rights, services, and support. Through critical analysis of legal, ethical, and humanitarian considerations, the dissertation discusses the implications of such disparities for the international protection regime. The final section offers policy recommendations aimed at fostering greater fairness, transparency, and international cooperation in asylum systems, with a call for reform to address inequalities in refugee treatment. This study contributes to the broader discourse on global refugee protection, urging a reevaluation of asylum policies to ensure they align with human rights principles and international obligations.