Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: /library/oar/handle/123456789/132747
Title: Prediction of slaughter age in pigs and assessment of the predictive value of phenotypic and genetic information using random forest
Authors: Alsahaf, Ahmad
Azzopardi, George
Ducro, Bart
Hanenberg, Egiel
Veerkamp, Roel F.
Petkov, Nicolai
Keywords: Swine -- Growth
Swine -- Productivity
Machine learning -- Agricultural applications
Livestock productivity -- Data processing
Issue Date: 2018
Publisher: Oxford Academic
Citation: Alsahaf, A., Azzopardi, G., Ducro, B., Hanenberg, E., Veerkamp, R. F., & Petkov, N. (2018). Prediction of slaughter age in pigs and assessment of the predictive value of phenotypic and genetic information using random forest. Journal of Animal Science, 96(12), 4935-4943.
Abstract: The weight of a pig and the rate of its growth are key elements in pig production. In particular, predicting future growth is extremely useful, since it can help in determining feed costs, pen space requirements, and the age at which a pig reaches a desired slaughter weight. However, making these predictions is challenging, due to the natural variation in how individual pigs grow, and the different causes of this variation. In this paper, we used machine learning, namely random forest (RF) regression, for predicting the age at which the slaughter weight of 120 kg is reached. Additionally, we used the variable importance score from RF to quantify the importance of different types of input data for that prediction. Data of 32,979 purebred Large White pigs were provided by Topigs Norsvin, consisting of phenotypic data, estimated breeding values (EBVs), along with pedigree and pedigree-genetic relationships. Moreover, we presented a 2-step data reduction procedure, based on random projections (RPs) and principal component analysis (PCA), to extract features from the pedigree and genetic similarity matrices for use as inputs in the prediction models. Our results showed that relevant phenotypic features were the most effective in predicting the output (age at 120 kg), explaining approximately 62% of its variance (i.e., R2 = 0.62). Estimated breeding value, pedigree, or pedigree-genetic features interchangeably explain 2% of additional variance when added to the phenotypic features, while explaining, respectively, 38%, 39%, and 34% of the variance when used separately.
URI: https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/132747
Appears in Collections:Scholarly Works - FacICTAI



Items in OAR@UM are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.